Wednesday, March 2, 2016

ROUGH DRAFT

For Peer Review on Friday, you must bring at least a 5 page draft of your paper to class. This is just a draft and does not need to be perfect, but it must be clean enough for your reviewer to read and comment on. The better your draft is, the more feedback  you can get. 10 points will be taken off of your final draft if you fail to come to class or participate in the peer review.

For your footnotes, use this link to clarify:
http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html


My Paper, to be used as a reference only (the margins are off, but you should have 1in on all sides) :


During the colonial era, enslaved Africans and their British captors transformed old-world marketing
 practices into a system of local commerce that was unique to the American   South. Both European 
and African women were expected to participate in small-scale food trade in order to maintain 
their households, and the sight of women selling homegrown vegetables, cooked foods, and 
other perishables throughout the Atlantic World was common.  Prior to industrialization, 
British women were responsible for the buying and selling of the majority of food in the
 urban and rural areas of England but they rarely engaged in the importing and exporting 
of sugar, tobacco, or cotton.[1]  In large West African cities like Eko, Ouidah, and Kano 
women also controlled vending in the local markets but unlike England, elite African 
women also dealt with large-scale trade in commodities like slaves, cloth, and salt.  
In the American South, social mores kept the unmarried sisters and widows of slave-owning 
men in a type of urban purdah and they rarely engaged in market activities, but their 
relationships with certain enslaved domestics allowed both groups of women to profit 
off of the gendered nature of the urban food trade. African and African American 
women utilized their strangely privileged positions in the market place to reinforce a 
type of internal economy and to create a version of southern commerce that reflected 
African customs.

        Like both their enslaved and free West African counterparts, bondwomen in the Low
       Country established economic relationships between themselves and their mistresses, but  
        also among groups of people on multiple plantations.  The task system encouraged
enslaved laborers to grow corn, yams, and gourds in addition to keeping hogs, 
chickens, and cows.  A property map of the plantation locations on a modern map 
creates visual depiction of the movements of enslaved people from rural areas to the 
Charleston marketplace. The WPA map identifies “negro grounds” where certain plantation 
owners, like the Maybank, Phillips, and Manigault families, allowed their enslaved workers 
to maintain independent fields for the cultivation of their own crops. Gabriel Manigault’s 
trusted laborer Cudjo travelled up to 24 miles on Sundays, an accustomed free day, to sell 
surplus produce in urban marketplaces.[2] Enslaved men were frequently seen by 
foreign travelers moving throughout the lowcountry with permission from their masters 
to sell surplus food crops in local marketplaces. These men were provided with the 
opportunity to move about the countryside unmolested and were the people who linked the 
plantation to the urban market. 

Borrowing from West African traditions, female vendors would meet these suppliers 
along specific routes in or around urban centers and purchase surplus goods. Bondwomen
used this strategy to control the rates of particular items, like corn or yams, and influenced
 their prices.  In 1772, a concerned citizen wrote to the South Carolina Gazette describing this 
practice, noting that “I have seen the country negroes take great pains, after having been first 
spoke to by those women to reserve whatever they chose to sell to them only, either by 
keeping the particular article in their canows, or by sending them away and pretending they
 were not for sale.”[3] Market women were so adept at these transactions the citizen 
proclaimed that “the wenches so briskly hustle them about from one to another that in 
two minutes they could no longer be traced.”[4] Trade networks allowed bonded laborers 
and market women to profit without having to include the dominant class in any monetary 
transactions. Through these processes, urban women and rural plantation workers organized
 a distinctive informal economy in southern slave society.


[1] E.P. Thompson, “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century,” Past and Present, 50 (1971); 
Alice Clark, Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth Century, (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Howe, 1920).
[2] Philip Morgan, “Work and Culture: The Task System and the World of Lowcountry Blacks, 1700 to 1880,” 
The William and Mary Quarterly 39, no. 4 (1982): 565; Genovese, Roll, Jordan, Roll, 1-7, 535-540; Douglas R. Egerton, 
“Markets Without a Market Revolution: Southern Planters and Capitalism,” Journal of the Early Republic 24 (2004): 212.
[3] South Carolina Gazette, September 24, 1772.
[4] South Carolina Gazette, September 24, 1772.

No comments:

Post a Comment